Jake Melksham’s failure to fully disclose details of his betting accounts and subsequent punishment from head office have exposed yet again the fraught relationship between the AFL and gambling that continues to cast a shadow over the game’s integrity.It has emerged that both Melksham and his friend and former Essendon teammate Stewart Crameri were interrogated by AFL investigators last October following a series of bets on greyhounds that dated to June 2016 — one of which had been part of a wider successful plunge that had caught the eye of a betting agency.
Share on Facebook SHARE Share on Twitter TWEET
Jake Melksham: sense of ”deja vu” in the interview room. Photo: Getty Images Melksham had acted as a “new bowler” – or commission agent – for the prolific greyhound punter Lachlan Vine. Melksham had acted as a “new bowler” – or commission agent – for the prolific greyhound punter Lachlan Vine. It is a common practice, not illegal, in which big gamblers, who, because they are too successful, have been “banned” by certain betting agencies or bookmakers, use another punter’s account to place their bets and then pay the account-holder a commission on their winnings.Crameri, now at the Western Bulldogs, is one of Vine’s closest friends and is understood to have introduced Vine to Melksham. While there is no suggestion that any of the three acted outside the law, the bets were reported to the AFL’s integrity unit and both players were summoned for questioning.Crameri was upfront with the investigators and cleared but Melksham initially failed to admit to the full details of his betting accounts.This led to his financial punishment and public embarrassment this week.
Having been banned for the 2016 season for his role in the Essendon supplements program, Melksham has subsequently told others he panicked, having undergone an alarming sense of deja vu in the interview room reminiscent of his sessions with AFL and ASADA officials.The AFL’s handling of the investigation has left both the AFL Players Association and Melksham’s manager Paul Connors unimpressed.Melbourne’s football boss Josh Mahoney was kept informed of the investigation, but neither the AFLPA nor Connors were made aware of the issue until very recently. Melksham was under the impression he could not reveal any details to either party although the AFL has subsequently claimed he was mistaken.The view of both the players’ union and the manager is that they should have been officially informed by the AFL and could have better advised Melksham who has endured a form slump over the past fortnight as he awaited punishment. That very issue is part of the AFLPA’s list of claims in the collective bargaining agreement negotiations.Players’ association executive Brett Murphy said on Friday that his union was determined that the mandatory disclosure when players faced any form of disciplinary hearing be written into the next CBA. “It should be a matter of course if a player is being investigated by the AFL or involved in any serious disciplinary issue that both the player’s agent and the AFLPA be made aware of that investigation,” he said.Melksham’s reported fine of $10,000 will, in fact, be taken out of his wages and, in reality, amount to around $6000 after tax.But his story is part of a much wider concern regarding the betting habits and gambling culture still endemic among footballers – so many of whom are losing thousands of dollars betting online on American sports. So many players with extra downtime and large di…